RE: [xacml] Vote for XACML F2F Date, Location, and Duration...

[Ken Yagen <kyagen@crosslogix.com>]

Title: RE: [xacml] Vote for XACML F2F Date, Location, and Duration...

FYI, the state department did issue a travel warning regarding Milan recently:

http://travel.state.gov/italy_announce.html

Ken Yagen
Director, Software Development
CrossLogix, Inc
www.crosslogix.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Polar Humenn [mailto:polar@syr.edu]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:58 AM
To: xacml list
Subject: RE: [xacml] Vote for XACML F2F Date, Location, and Duration...

Great! Now, any clue about where to stay in Milan?

Cheers,
-Polar

On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Carlisle Adams wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> It's Monday morning, the votes are in, and here are the results...
>
> Firstly, we can trim down the choices somewhat:
>  - nobody seems to want to meet in San Francisco on the Saturday
> morning (it received no votes, although Bill indicated that it would
> be as acceptable to him as any of the other 2.5-day options), so the
> SF slot is W(pm)TF
>  - those voting for Milan either indicated no preference in days or chose
> (b) (the only exception was Simon, who chose (a), but I'm assuming he would
> not be opposed to (b)), so the Milan slot is MTW(am)
>
> Actual votes:
>  - Milan:  Anne, Ernesto, Michiharu, Pierangela, Bill, Don, Polar,
> Simon
> (8)
>  - SF:  Anne, Ken, Michiharu, Bill  (4)
>
> Extra information:
>  - I just spoke with Hal on the phone and he indicated that he could
> probably attend either location, though he had a slight preference for
> California (he was on vacation all last week and so was not able to
> cast a vote in time)
>  - Tim indicated to me that Entrust would send one person to Milan but
> could conceivably send two to SF
>  - I assume that Don, Polar, and Simon (who all voted for Milan) could
> also go to SF if the meeting was there
>
> Totals:
>  - with the extra information above, we have the following numbers
>     - Milan:  Anne, Ernesto, Michiharu, Pierangela, Bill, Don, Polar,
> Simon, [Hal, 1-from-Entrust]  (total = 10)
>     - SF:  Anne, Ken, Michiharu, Bill, [Hal, Don, Polar, Simon,
> Carlisle, Tim]  (total = 10)
>
> Conclusion:
>  - potentially 10 people at either location, which would be quorum
>  - actual votes cast favoured Milan, and I did say that the most votes
> would win
>  - therefore, Milan is the winner!
>
> Next F2F date, location, and duration:
>  - {Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday morning}, April 22-24, 2002, University
> of Milan, Italy.
>
>
> Thanks to everyone for your participation!
>
> Carlisle.
>
> P.S., If anyone has serious objections my reasoning above, get them
> out now because those wanting 21-day advance bookings for cheaper
> fares will probably need to book today...
>
>
> > ----------
> > From:       Carlisle Adams[SMTP:carlisle.adams@entrust.com]
> > Sent:       Monday, March 25, 2002 1:02 PM
> > To:         xacml list; 'bill parducci'
> > Subject:    [xacml] Vote for XACML F2F Date, Location, and Duration...
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Apologies for not getting this out earlier.  I had agreed to send
> > this after our TC concall last Thursday, but then was tied up the
> > rest of that day and was traveling all day Friday.
> >
> >     ----------
> > From:   bill parducci[SMTP:bill@parducci.net]
> > Sent:   Sunday, March 24, 2002 10:18 PM
> > To:     xacml list
> > Subject:        [xacml] next f2f
> >
> >     is there a timeline and/or mechanism for determining when and where
> > the next f2f will occur? are we waiting for the next all-hands
> > meeting? voting via e-mail?
> >
> >
> > Yes, I'm calling for an e-mail vote which will close first thing
> > Monday morning (April 1st).  That is, I'll count whatever's in my
> > in-box when I get into work on Monday morning.  Votes should be sent
> > to the list as a response to this message.
> >
> > There are a couple of things on which to vote.
> >
> > 1) Date and Location.  The choices are as follows (pick one):
> >        a) Mon.-Tue., April 22-23 in Milan, Italy (hosted by
> > Pierangela and Ernesto at U. Milan)
> >        b) Thu.-Fri., April 25-26 in San Francisco, USA (hosted by
> > Ken Yagen at CrossLogix)
> >        c) either choice is acceptable
> >        d) I cannot attend either choice
> >
> > 2) Duration.  There has been a proposal to add an extra half day to
> > the meeting.  The choices are as follows (pick one):
> >
> >        a) MILAN:  Mon. afternoon, Tue. full day, Wed. full day
> >        b) MILAN:  Mon. full day, Tue. full day, Wed morning
> >        c) SF:  Wed. afternoon, Thu. full day, Fri. full day
> >        d) SF:  Thu. full day, Fri. full day, Sat. morning
> >        e) forget about the extra half day; two full days is enough
> >
> > The largest number of votes on each item wins.
> >
> > Our face-to-face meetings have been well-attended and very
> > productive so far; hopefully, we can continue this tradition.
> >
> > Carlisle.
> >
> >
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>