[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] proposed amendment to Polar's resolution of PM-2-05
in a side discussion with polar it was my impresssion that this exchange excluded responses to a PEP. is this consistent with the understganding of others? i have a BIG problem with a a PDP returning anything to a PEP other than the decision/obligation, particularly if it provides information on how to acheive a decision. b > "Beznosov, Konstantin" wrote: > > I suggest to amend the text of the resolution so that the above > fragment will read the following: The PDP MAY return an "authorization decision" of "indeterminate" with an error code of "insufficient information", signifying that more information needed. In this case, the "authorization decision" MAY list the names of any attributes of the subject and the resource that are needed by the PDP to refine its "authorization decision".
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC