[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] E-mail vote results, and one outstanding question...
After seeing the OCL example, I also am very uncomfortable with requiring OCL as our language for describing the semantics of operators. On the other hand, unqualified, arbitrary "pseudocode" is not "crystal clear" when we are trying to specify platform independent, interoperable implementations. Could we use the pseudocode in 7.1, and add just enough text to specify what the various elements in the pseudocode mean? Something like The above pseudocode is interpreted as in common procedural languages such as C except for the following: 1) rule[] refers to the array of rules in the <ruleSet>; policy[] refers to the array of policies in the <policySet>. 2) variable types are implicitly determined by the type of the value with which they are initialized. 3) a reference to rule[i] or policy[i] refers to the result returned when the specified rule or policy is evaluated. Anne -- Anne H. Anderson Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM Sun Microsystems Laboratories 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC