[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] E-mail vote results
here are my thoughts: 1. the reason that i proposed that we not use java syntax is that it will make XACML dependent upon a vendor specific language. while i like java i don't think that this is a good thing. 2. describe 'java-like' -- how does this differ from 'pseudo code'? my thinking is you are either [fill in the blank with language of choice] compliant or you have a homegrown solution. the concern i have with a homegrown solution is that we now become the authority for the associated syntax. maybe our requirements are simple enough that this isn't an issue. i suggest that maybe we should discuss what we perceive to be the *reasonable* scope for this before proceeding? b On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 08:57, ernesto damiani wrote: > Dear all, > > I am also not convinced about the choice of OCL. I understand current > discussion implies we abandoned the idea of Java-like syntax, though > apparently I was off the list during the debate. Anyone willing to comment > on why? > rgds > ernesto >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC