[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] Attribute and AttributeDesignator for XACML...
this is my recollection as well. b On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 10:10, Carlisle Adams wrote: > My recollection is that we decided that we probably did not need > MajorVersion, MinorVersion, AssertionID, Conditions, or Advice for XACML (it > seems highly unlikely that anyone would write a rule/policy in which an > attribute was qualified by a MinorVersion or an Advice element, whereas it > is certainly possible that someone would want to qualify an attribute by > Issuer). So, making them more compact is certainly one goal. > > However, given that we're defining the "Holder" schema, we do have the > freedom to make other changes if we want (e.g., not using the NameQualifier > and Format attributes). My preference is not to make such changes lightly > (i.e., unless it seems critically important), but we do have this freedom... > > Carlisle. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC