[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [xacml] RE: XACML question [Fwd: PDP-PRP protocol?]
Hi Gerald Did you subscribe to the mailing list? You have to request of the chair, either Carlisle or Hal, to subscribe to the mailing list. I have copied your mail to the list. Don -----Original Message----- From: Gerald Brose [mailto:Gerald.Brose@xtradyne.com] Sent: Mon 5/27/2002 12:05 PM To: Flinn, Don; Beznosov, Konstantin Cc: Gerald Brose Subject: XACML question [Fwd: PDP-PRP protocol?] Hi Don and Konstantin, I tried to send the following message to the xacml list, but was not allowed not post there (although I am a "prospective TC member" now). Could you have a look at my question and either a) tell me what I am missing here, or perhaps b) forward this question to the list on my behalf? Thanks for your time and cheers, Gerald. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: PDP-PRP protocol? Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 17:52:21 +0200 From: Gerald Brose <Gerald.Brose@xtradyne.com> Reply-To: Gerald.Brose@xtradyne.com Organization: Xtradyne Technologies To: xacml@lists.oasis-open.org CC: Gerald Brose <Gerald.Brose@xtradyne.com> Hi, I was wondering whether the policy request interface between the PDP and the PDP would not benefit from a standardized interface (p. 15 of the v13 draft). The return value from the PRP has a standard format (viz. XACML policyStatement), but the request hasn't. I would have thought that interoperability using this interface could potentially be one of the main selling points of XACML for PEP/PDP vendors ("mechanism vendors") and PRP/PAP vendors ("tool vendors"). Best regards, Gerald. -- Dr. Gerald Brose, Software Architect mailto:brose@xtradyne.com Xtradyne Technologies http://www.xtradyne.com Schoenhauser Allee 6-7, Phone: +49-30-440 306-27 D-10119 Berlin, Germany Fax : +49-30-440 306-78
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC