RE: [xacml] Reducing number of functions for 1.0

[Carlisle Adams <carlisle.adams@entrust.com>]

Title: RE: [xacml] Reducing number of functions for 1.0

Hi,

I'm fine with this.

Carlisle.

----------
From:   Anne Anderson - Sun Microsystems[SMTP:Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM]
Reply To:       Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM
Sent:   Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:33 AM
To:     xacml@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:        [xacml] Reducing number of functions for 1.0

Are members interested in trying to minimize the number of functions
that have to be supported (and tested) for XACML 1.0?

Here are two proposals for reducing our current list:

1. Rather than support *-not-equal, expect people to use
   <function:not><function:*-equal>

2. Rather than support *-less-than and *-less-than-or-equal,
   expect people to use
        <function:not><function:*-greater-than-or-equal>
   for *-less-than, and
        <function:not><function:*-greater-than>
   for *-less-than-or-equal.

-Anne

Anne Anderson       Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM
Internet Security Research Group, Sun Labs
Sun Microsystems, Inc., Burlington, MA




----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>