[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [xacml] Re: [xacml-comment] Incomplete: behavior if <Obligations>present but not supported
Why doesn't the PDP support Obligations? I thought it did. I thought the issue was whether the PEP supported Obligations, of which I think we solved. Isn't it all laid out pretty well, on how the obligations are collected up the evaluation, right? It's in the schema, right? I really don't like the PDP returing "Deny" for something "wrong", as if it is taking the presumption that Deny is the "safe" answer for you. If anything, if this really is indeed the case, I believe the "answer" should be Intdeterminate. Too busy at the OMG meeting,.... -Polar
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC