[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] Reviewed os 1.0 Draft 3
On 12 February, Satoshi Hada writes: Re: [xacml] Reviewed os 1.0 Draft 3 > This makes sense to me. > > >> If a user of XACML wants to return a consistent set of > >> Obligations, then the user must define a new combining > >> algorithm that specifies the order of evaluation or requires > >> that all components of the policy must be fully evaluated. > > So should I conclude that it's difficult to create conformance test cases > for testing obligations in case of the standard POLICY combining > algorithms? > (I know it's possible to create them in case of the standard RULE combining > algorithms.) Yes, I think it would be difficult. Anyone else thought about this? Anne -- Anne H. Anderson Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM Sun Microsystems Laboratories 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC