OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xacml message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: [xacml] Reviewed os 1.0 Draft 3


On 12 February, Satoshi Hada writes: Re: [xacml] Reviewed os 1.0 Draft 3
 > This makes sense to me.
 > 
 > >>  If a user of XACML wants to return a consistent set of
 > >>   Obligations, then the user must define a new combining
 > >>   algorithm that specifies the order of evaluation or requires
 > >>   that all components of the policy must be fully evaluated.
 > 
 > So should I conclude that it's difficult to create conformance test cases
 > for testing obligations in case of the standard POLICY combining
 > algorithms?
 > (I know it's possible to create them in case of the standard RULE combining
 > algorithms.)

Yes, I think it would be difficult.  Anyone else thought about this?

Anne
-- 
Anne H. Anderson             Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311     Tel: 781/442-0928
Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA  Fax: 781/442-1692



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC