[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] Re: [xacml-comment] xpath-node-match and IIIG004Policy.xml. Forwardedmessage from John Merrells.
Satoshi has responded to this.
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml-comment/200305/msg00001.html
Michiharu Kudo
Anne Anderson
<Anne.Anderson@Su To: XACML TC <xacml@lists.oasis-open.org>
n.com> cc:
Subject: [xacml] Re: [xacml-comment] xpath-node-match and IIIG004Policy.xml. Forwarded message from
2003/05/07 22:24 John Merrells.
Please respond to
Anne.Anderson
Can someone who is XPath-aware respond to this?
Thanks,
Anne Anderson
------- start of forwarded message -------
From: John Merrells <merrells@jiffysoftware.com>
To: XACML COMMENT <xacml-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [xacml-comment] xpath-node-match and IIIG004Policy.xml
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 13:51:17 -0700
On Sunday, March 9, 2003, at 10:35 PM, John Merrells wrote:
> The test uses the xpath expression '/' as the first argument for the
> xpath-node-match function. The function specification says to
> evaluate the enhanced xpath expression 'a|a//*|a//@*'. In this
> case 'a' is '/'... which gives us the xpath expression '/|///*|///@*'.
> Unfortunately neither '///*' nor '///@*' are valid xpath expressions.
> Interesting problem...
I don't think anyone responded to this.
Which is correct the spec or the test?
John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xacml-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xacml-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
------- end of forwarded message -------
--
Anne H. Anderson Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928
Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]