[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] Proposed XACML 1.1 Solution for Item F1:Properties for newcombining algorithms
I still think this proposal adds a dangerous "catch-all" element to XACML. Since any PDP that understands one of these new combining algorithms that requires parameters will need to be a custom PDP, why not let this be a custom extension? Why do we need to standardize it? Before we standardize an element like this, I think we need a strong use case based on actual customer demand. The use case would need to require that we would standardize one or more combining algorithms that require this element at the same time. As we worked on standardizing such an algorithm, we could better consider whether this <Property> element is really the best solution, or if there is something more controllable that would suffice. Anne -- Anne H. Anderson Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM Sun Microsystems Laboratories 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]