Re: [xacml] Schedules for 1.1 and 2.0

[bill parducci <bill.parducci@overxeer.com>]

looks like we are running behind at least a month.

b

Anne Anderson wrote:
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200303/msg00011.html
> contains the minutes from our 6 March 2003 meeting.  That
> contains the most recent update to our schedule for 1.1 and for
> 2.0 that I could find:
> 
> 4. Target schedule for completing XACML 1.1 work
> ...
>    3 April 2003:   Concrete problem statements due.  Any
>                    item that does not have a concrete problem
>                    statement by this date automatically falls out
>                    of XACML 1.1 (could become part of 1.1+ or
>                    2.0)
>    end April 2003: Rough agreement on solution for each item.
>    end May   2003: Committee Spec vote