[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] xacml 1.1 draft 1
I thought I wrote one for the Glossary, didn't I? On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Tim Moses wrote: > Colleagues - One other thing. Merely in the interests of stylistic > consistency, why don't we have a succinct definition of "type unification" > in the Glossary, and explain how to do it in that part of the specification > where the concept is used? All the best. Tim. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Moses [mailto:tim.moses@entrust.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 9:40 AM > To: 'Simon Godik'; xacml@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [xacml] xacml 1.1 draft 1 > > > Colleagues - A handful of editorial comments. > > Lines 4 and 31. This is a committee spec., not an OASIS spec.. > Line 5. Perhaps, we should just assign a document id. Let's not wait for > an OASIS numbering system. > Lines 11 - 24. Needs updating. Also suggest removing email addresses. > Also Appendix D. > Line 995. Wrong font. > Line 1950. " ... be combined by the algorithm specified by ..." becomes " > ... be combined using the algorithm specified by ..." (Just removes > repetition of "by"). > Line 2612. "The selected node is different from the node types listed > above". But the list above contains constructor functions (according to > line 2583). > Lines 2635 - 2645. Non-normative language. In four place "is" should be > "SHALL be". > Lines 3107 - 3117 and lines 3130 - 3144. The phrases in the text don't > match the phrases in the table. e.g. "At least one applicable" in the text, > whereas "At least one rule value is its Effect" in the table. > Lines 3172 - 3193. I am personally still not happy with this explanation. > I don't have a specific proposal. But, one signal that something is wrong > comes from the fact that in line 3175 we say that "A named attribute is the > term for the criteria ...". But, in line 3180 we say that "A named > attribute has specific criteria ...". Is "attribute instance" more > descriptive than "named attribute"? > > I should point out that most of these comments apply to the original > editor's work. All the best. Tim. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Godik [mailto:simon.godik@overxeer.com] > Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 5:05 PM > To: xacml@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [xacml] xacml 1.1 draft 1 > > > Here is xacml 1.1 draft 1 > > Please let me know if I left something out. > Simon > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]