[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Small adjustment on Item 7: ConditionReference
I agree to the restriction on the applicability of the condition reference as we discussed during the f2f meeting. So the proposal should include the following sentence: "condition references does not extend beyond the policy boundary." I believe that this is the adjustment on which we have agreed. Best, Michiharu bill parducci <bill@parducci.ne To: Michiharu Kudoh/Japan/IBM@IBMJP t> cc: Subject: konnichi wa! 2003/10/31 01:21 on the concall today there was a little confusion as to the decisions and discussions that took place regarding this work item: 7. ConditionReference TYPE: Simplicity of policy construction Allow a Rule to contain a ConditionReference element as an alternative to a Condition element. The ConditionReference would identify a Condition element specified elsewhere. An optional ConditionId attribute would be added to the Condition element to support this. TYPE: Simplicity of policy construction. STATUS: Accepted for 2.0 20 Oct 2003. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200304/msg00039.html CHAMPION: Michiharu Kudo on the call we agreed that there was general agreement for the proposal, but that it was felt that a point that was brought up in the f2f should be inserted into the proposal directly for clarity: condition references may not extend beyond the policy boundary. so, if this is consistent with what you intended for this proposal would you mind making a slight adjustment and posting it to the list so that we can formally vote on it? thanks b
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]