RE: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?

["Daniel Engovatov" <dengovatov@bea.com>]

> On 4 March, Frank Siebenlist writes: Re: [xacml] request's attribute
assertion lifetime?
>  > It just intrigues me why we have this InstantIssue element of the
attribute
>  > defined? What was the use case for that?
>
> Good question.  I think it should be removed.  Why didn't we
> include validity interval?  It would have made more sense, but we
> didn't.  I think both fall into the category of "things the
> Context Handler is supposed to check".

>I whole heartily agree, but I think you already knew that. :)


Second that.   You knew that too. :)