RE: [xacml] legal values for Strings

[Seth Proctor <Seth.Proctor@Sun.COM>]

On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 14:40, Daniel Engovatov wrote:
> None of the XACML standard data types had to be represented as complex
> content, so that would definitely be an extension.   It seems to me that
> your example is not valid (need to have all the proper &lt etc..) - is
> it?

Well, I'd like the example I gave to be invalid. This gets back to my
previous posting about AttributeAssignments. We have examples that look like:

  <AttributeAssignment DataType="...:string" AttributeId="..."
    <AttributeSelector ...
  </AttributeAssignment>

As I read that, we're looking at an AttributeValue (the assignment) of
type string that contains complex content. Thus, my concern.


seth