RE: [xacml] Obligations in Rules roundup

["Daniel Engovatov" <dengovatov@bea.com>]

>Would you sell a product that had that "feature", of "Well, I don't
know,
>run it a few times, see what you get".

No, but that does not imply that we need to force one particular way of
avoiding that.  

There are MANY areas where different XACML providers may be not
interoperable.  This is one example.   That does not mean that we need
to mandate some particular narrow solution that one of us happened to
like.

Daniel;