[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] ip address datatype & matching function proposal
Daniel Engovatov wrote: > Ouch. That is quite a lot of work, Bill. :) > > That makes me wonder - shouldn't we just wait when somebody working with > IP based policies designs, gets some practical experiences, and > publishes an extension function/datatype profile that we could adopt? I'm with you, Daniel. We're supposed to be defining a core language and enough "extensions" (like standard functions or datatypes) to promote interoperability. I'd like to see functions like this promoted in separate profiles, and I'd like to see them happen when people deploying XACML can provide feedback on exactly what they want to do. Not to say I don't see value in what Bill suggested, because I certainly do. I just think that we should stick to the core features at this point and let features like this (which clearly require a fair deal of thought and feedback from users) progress separately. seth
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]