Re: [xacml] Type-is-in should be a match function

[Seth Proctor <Seth.Proctor@Sun.COM>]

On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 09:16, Tim Moses wrote:
> Colleagues - Section 7.5 lists the xacml functions that qualify as a match
> function.  I believe type-is-in has the necessary qualifications and should
> be included in the list.  Any thoughts?  All the best.  Tim.

The type-is-in functions cannot be used in a Target's MatchId, since
you're not evaluating over a bag, but between two base types. In fact,
none of the bag functions may be used in a Target match.


seth