[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] all-of-any/any-of-all
The Haskell specification, of course, is extremely and formally precise about it. :) Cheers, -Polar On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Bill Parducci wrote: > heck, i'm confused just reading the problem :o) my thinking is that if > you and polar think it is confusing then others will too, so a proposal > for alternate text would be of tangible value. > > just my two cents... > > b > > Seth Proctor wrote: > > In a conversation over the weekend, I realized that the english text > > used in the specification for the all-of-any and any-of-all functions is > > at best confusing and at worst incorrect. Specifically, the problem is > > with the word "collectively" which implies that all values from the > > "all" bag must be evaluated against the same value from the "any" bag. > > I'm also not sure the description for using the and function (in > > all-of-any) or the or function (in any-of-all) is correct. I pinged > > Polar about this, and he (I think) agreed that the text could use some > > tweaking. > > > > Would someone like to agree or disagree on this point? Is it just me? > > Can someone explain to me how the text about using and/or (the 5th > > sentence of the 2nd paragraph in both sections) makes sense? If anyone > > else agrees that this needs work then I'll propose some alternate text. > > > > > > seth > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.php. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]