Re: [xacml] RE: 2.0 draft 13 comments

[Seth Proctor <Seth.Proctor@Sun.COM>]

> Seth - The reason that the core spec. commonly qualifies 
> <AttributeValue>
> with the "xacml:" namespace is that <AttributeValue> is defined 
> separately
> and differently in both the xacml and xacml-context namespaces.  So, I
> suggest rejecting your comment on Section 7.3.  Let me know if you 
> disagree.
> All the best.  Tim.

Ah. That does explain in. Thanks. In that case I would consider 
prefixing the rest of the elements, just so others don't get confused 
too (unless this is just another case of my being more confused than 
average <g>).


seth