[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: The latest delegation draft
All, I have uploaded a new version of the delegation draft. There are quite many changes. I have tried to improve the content and formatting of the various parts of the specification. I added missing parts of the schema fragments. I think the everything the current processing model refers to should be there now, but many features that have been discussed are not there yet, for instance "Access Permitted", passing policies and attribute assertions in the request and max delegation depth. I included the improvements that Anne suggested recently. During the last focus group meeting we discussed whether we should call the new elements of the target/request "Issuer" or "Delegate". I said then I would make it consistently "Issuer", but instead I have made them "Delegate". This is mostly due to that this was much less work for me now since 99% of the existing draft used "Delegate" and that I fear that "Issuer" would be confused with the policy issuer. During the focus meeting I also promised to Hal that I would give an example on the use of LaterDelegate, but I haven't had the time to do that yet. I decided to post the draft now anyway, and I will try to have it for the next version instead. I also removed Tim's pseudocode. During the focus meeting we decided do that for now, and perhaps reintroduce it later. I have added new open issues to the open issues list, so please have a look at it as well. There are some simple issues there that we should just decide on. Oh, and a small note: When writing the draft, I have stolen some text from the 2.0 specification. I hope that is ok. Just let me know whether I should reference that in some way. To move on with this, I would like that we make some decisions on the simple open issues. I would also like to get more feedback on whether this looks to satisfy everyone's needs and that it does no look to complex. For the text, I think much of it is in a bad state right now, so I think it needs more work to make it more clear. Any suggestions on that would be appreciated. I am not sure how to best make the non-normative introductory texts as clear as possible. I feel that this is of high priority for the next version, before we move on with more features. Best regards, Erik
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]