[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] XPath 2.0 support
Yes, oops. :-) I had the impression that the errata was a document with just changes, not the full spec, so I never even had a look at it. No big deal, I'll figure it out. There are Word diffs of what I have made, so it would be easy to reapply what I have done to the ITU-T version. Regards, Erik Anne Anderson - Sun Microsystems wrote: > Oops, the current drafts should have been based on the Errata version, > which included all the ITU-T changes. > > If I can find time, I'll try to do a compare to see what needs to be > added/changed. Abbie Barbir and I both did extensive changes which > did not affect the normative interpretation, but were necessary to > meet ITU-T requirements. Since we will want to submit XACML 3.0 for > ITU-T approval also, the same changes will need to be done. > > Regards, > Anne
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]