Re: [xacml] XACML 2.0 errata and 3.0

[Anne Anderson - Sun Microsystems <Anne.Anderson@sun.com>]

I recommend referring to the now-approved XPath and XQuery standards. 
Referencing the standard means people can re-use standard 
implementations of the XPath and XQuery functions with confidence.  It 
also makes our own specification simpler and less prone to introduced 
errors.

Regards,
Anne

Erik Rissanen wrote:
> All,
> 
> For the next 3.0 core draft I was planning to incorporate all the 2.0
> errata. Most of it concerns the definition of some data types and
> functions copied from xpath/xquery.
> 
> The copying was made to accommodate ITU since xpath/xquery was not
> approved at the time. Anne raised the issue earlier about going back to
> referring to the xpath/xquery, rather than copying text, now that they
> have been approved.
> 
> What should I do it for the next 3.0 draft? Should I copy text like the
> current 2.0 errata, or should I refer to the approved version of
> xpath/xquery?
> 
> What should I do for future 2.0 errata? Should I keep the copied text,
> or should we revert back to referring to xpath/xquery?
> 
> Regards,
> Erik
> 

-- 
Anne H. Anderson             Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311     Tel: 781/442-0928
Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA  Fax: 781/442-1692