RE: [xacml] New Functionx for XACML 3.0

["Daniel Engovatov" <dengovatov@bea.com>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Craig Forster [mailto:cforster@au1.ibm.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 5:36 PM
To: Daniel Engovatov
Cc: XACML TC
Subject: RE: [xacml] New Functionx for XACML 3.0

>Hi Daniel,

>Perhaps there's value in defining some to generic way to call XPath 2.0
>functions in an XACML policy?  However, I think most of the XPath 2.0
>functions already have equivalents in XACML 2.0, so it's probably
easier
>just to extend the XACML functions to fill in the gaps.

Yes, that's what I meant by "using" - reusing names and definitions,
(and possibly allowing to reuse implementations), but doing that by
incorporating them into the XACML standard.

>> I am not sure what an "integer-contains" function would mean.
>By <type> in my original email I mean just "string" and "uri".

Maybe URI needs some URI-specific functions, and may reuse string
versions for the rest of the needed operations?


Daniel



Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.