[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Some issues in 3.0 core wd 5
All, I just posted a new 3.0 core working draft. Here are a couple of minor issues which I thought I should bring to your attention: - It seems to me that the text in section 5.39 contradicts the text in section 7 regarding the action of the PEP in case of unrecognized obligations. 5.39 mandates a deny action, while 7 specifies more alternatives based on a PEP "bias". - There is a strange data type encoding in the sample rule in section 4.2.4.2. Is that right? - I have removed the text "Normative" from the main section headings since the OASIS template stated that all text is normative unless otherwise noted. - The glossary term "Type unification" is not used anywhere besides in the definition of the term "Type unification". Could we remove it? - I made my own style for the glossary terms since I didn't find anything suitable in the OASIS template. I hope it is ok for the OASIS style people. :-) Best regards, Erik
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]