Re: [xacml] F2F proposed agenda updated

[Erik Rissanen <erik@axiomatics.com>]

All,

Currently the proposed agenda is very "waterfall" formatted. First we do 
core, then hierarchical, then multiple. I think it would be better to 
interleave the issues across several iterations. That way I could push 
out updated working drafts during the days to clear up wording issues, 
etc, across multiple iterations. I am afraid that a "big bang" attempt 
to solve the thorny issues are going to take up all the time unless we 
section them up into smaller pieces which get written down in a working 
draft for common understanding.


Tuesday - December 8

9:00 - 9:15: Roll, administrivia, agenda review
9:15 - 9:30 Discuss process, reqs for Issues 29, 30, 31
9:30 - 10:30  Issues 3, 4 (core): first decisions
10:30 - 10:45 Break
10:45 - 12:00 Issues 11, 16 (Hierarchical): first decisions
12:00 - 1:00 Lunch
1:00 - 2:30 Issues 19, 23, 25, 26, 61 (Multi-resource): first decisions
2:30 - 2:45 Break
2:45 - 5:00 Issue 60 (Profile relationship): first outline
5:00 Recess

Wednesday - December 9

8:00 - 8:30 Review & Agenda confirmation
8:30 - 10:30 Issues 3, 4 (core): closing
10:30 - 10:45 Break
10:45 - 12:00 Issues 11, 16 (Hierarchical): closing
12:00 - 1:00 Lunch
1:00 - 2:30 Issues 19, 23, 25, 26, 61 (Multi-resource): closing
2:30 - 2:45 Break
2:45 - 4:30 Issue 60 (Profile relationship): closing
4:30 - 5:00 Planning the next day
5:00 Recess

Hopefully we can spend the third day on future work.

I hope to be able to prepare new drafts during the night Tu-We or maybe 
during the daytime breaks.

I haven't redone the agenda on the wiki yet. Thought I'll post my 
proposal here first for some feedback.

To prepare, I think it would be good if we all arrive at the F2F with a 
ready list of current/competing proposals on all the issues so we are 
all understand the proposals and so we can dig straight in. I will start 
another thread for calling for enumeration of proposals. I will collect 
a first version of the list myself.

Best regards,
Erik



On 2009-11-30 14:12, Tyson, Paul H wrote:
> I suggest grouping all the xpath-related issues together for discussion
> at once.  That would cover issues 3, 11, 16, 61, 62, and my recent
> proposal that does not have an issue number yet
> (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200911/msg00072.html).  This
> could take several sessions.
>
> --Paul
>
>    
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: bill parducci [mailto:bill@parducci.net]
>> Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 09:29
>> To: XACML TC
>> Subject: [xacml] F2F proposed agenda updated
>>
>> I have updated the proposed agenda for the F2F to begin
>> assigning time blocks to specific topics. Note that this
>> agenda calls for the TC meeting scheduled for December 10th
>> to be moved back 1 hour. The idea here is to allow the
>> meeting to coincide with the F2F time boundaries and to
>> provide a specific point at which official TC business may
>> occur (voting, etc.)
>>
>> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xacml/MeetingAgenda
>>
>> Please review the agenda and provide comments/suggestions to the list.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> b
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS
>> TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your
>> TCs in OASIS at:
>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr
>>      
> oups.php
>    
>>
>>      
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>