[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] minor bug in the XACML 3.0 core spec
Lets
talk about it on the call.
I
beleive that if the changes are non-substantive we can do all the necessary
votes on a single call. We can vote to CD based on a WD. We can then vote to
have the chairs request a CS ballot once the CD version has been created. The
actual CS ballot has to be online anyway.
The
changes proposed by Jan are to examples. The changes proposed by Ludwick are to
non-normative schema fragments. It seems clear to me that all these changes are
non-substantive.
Legally we can ignore these comments because a) they
were made after the end of the PR and b) they are not in scope for the PR sicen
they were not changed since the 1st PR.
I
understand the frustration on how long this has all taken, but I hate to go
final with known errata.
Hal
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]