[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes for 27 January 2011 TC Meeting
Time: 13:00 EDT Tel: 513-241-0892 Access Code: 65998 Minutes for 27 January 2011 TC Meeting (from Bill thru multi-decision, from Rich for remainder): I. Roll Call Voting Members Hal Lockhart (Chair) Bill Parducci (Co-Chair, minutes) Rich Levinson (minutes) Erik Rissanen Paul Tyson Doron Grinstein Non-voting Members Gregory Neven Franz-Stefan Preiss David Chadwick Individual Group Member Jan Herrmann Individual Group Member Anthony Nadalin Microsoft Corporation Group Member David Choy EMC Corporation Group Member Quorum met: (54% per Kavi) II. Administrivia Approve Minutes: 13 January 2010 TC Meeting: APPROVED unanimously Reminder of NIST IDTrust Call for Papers http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201101/msg00006.html Test Case Repo Bill noted that svn repo has 1.0 tagged, 1.1 is "trunk" in repo and that if someone added in v2 we will need to be split it out so that 1.1 can be tagged. III. Issues v3 WSDL Doron offered to investigate contributing a v3 wsdl. Multi-decision Jan briefly reviewed his reply to the Users list. Paul agreed that using Attribute Selector would be difficult to implement. http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201101/msg00022.html Clarifications on Hierarchical Profile on xacml-users: rich: messages on this thread are something of a review of the decisions that went into the current 3.0 profile; no changes or issues have come up yet. http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml-users/201101/msg00015.html Attribute Assertions in XACML request suggestion (Rich): need to review replies from Greg, Paul: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201101/msg00026.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201101/msg00023.html comment (Erik): following from Erik's email: Gregory's answer was that with the attribute approach it is necessary to define an attribute identifier for each conditional one needs to use in the policy, while this is not necessary with the predicate approach, which, I agree, is a great benefit. http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201101/msg00018.html discuss(Paul, Franz-Stefan): Paul's wiki page and Franz-Stefan comments: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201101/msg00021.html hal, david chadwick had discussion on amf files, as they relate to user attributes from creds to xacml attrs on credentials david c addressed topic w cred validation service, turn them into xacml attrs and feed into pdp specialized pip - open grid impl - paper in international journal xacml support multi-domain delegation of authority see David's pubs at Kent site used ws-trust to talk to credential validation - in box standard way. if pep doesn't want to talk to ws-trust they can use alternative authority greg: david and he have had discussions on credentials; cred-based is not what trying to give committee yet. paul: are david and greg having the same "interpretation" of "credential" Stephen legg questions on xacml-comment list we need to incorporate any fixes etc to errata, new versions Other business: hal: next call in 2 weeks: 10-feb-11 meeting adjourned not discussed yet: BTG Profile (Break The Glass): (not addressed last mtg so remains on agenda) original (David): http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201011/msg00017.html PIP directive (additional information directives) original (David): http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201010/msg00005.html latest: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201012/msg00022.html
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]