[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] XACML versions and ITU
I think so. I would certainly be willing to help out. Hal > -----Original Message----- > From: remon.sinnema@emc.com [mailto:remon.sinnema@emc.com] > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 1:45 AM > To: xacml@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [xacml] XACML versions and ITU > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hal.lockhart@oracle.com] > > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 6:30 PM > > To: Sinnema, Remon; xacml@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: RE: [xacml] XACML versions and ITU > > > > In 2006, Approved Errata was added to the OASIS TC Process, > but because > > of the complexity of the changes simply mechanically generating the > > differences between the documents would not produce > anything readable. > > What is need is for someone to sit down and figure out what > the actual > > changes are, not line by line, but in terms of individual consistent > > modifications. Then we could have something we could vote on and > > publicly review as specified by the TC Process. > > Could someone who wasn't a TC member at the time these > changes were introduced figure them out? For instance, by > just going through the mailing list archives? > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]