Re: [xacml] BTG sequence diagram

[Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net>]

On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 19:25 -0400, rich levinson wrote:
> I believe that presented this way, the scenario does not involve any
> of the "risks"
> you mentioned, and, I don't think it does anything "out of the
> ordinary", except
> takes advantage of the built in XACML capabilities to call out for
> external attrs
> as described in the data flow diagram of section 3.1 of 3.0 core spec.
> 

I agree my sequence diagram is a fine example of a proper XACML
implementation ;-)

I'm not so sure the BTG proposal on the table is quite as clear on the
important points where these components interact, so I hope we can move
toward a common understanding of the issues.

Regards,
--Paul