[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes for 28 July 2011 TC Meeting
I. Roll Call Voting Members Hal Lockhart (Chair) Bill Parducci (Co-Chair, minutes) David Brossard Erik Rissanen Paul Tyson Gregory Neven Rich Levinson John Tolbert Members Crystal Hayes Richard Hill Quorum met: (66% per Kavi) I. Roll Call & Approve Minutes: Minutes from 21 July 2011 TC meeting voted on. APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. II. Administrivia New Members John introduced Crystal Hayes and and Richard Hill from Boeing as new participants in the TC. V3 Procedural Status Bill has submitted the SAML and RBAC Profiles and v3 Core XACML documents to Oasis as Committee Draft and requested a 15 day Public Review, per the vote last week by the TC. Meeting Schedule, Guest Speaker The TC meeting schedule will move back to alternate weeks, with the next meeting on 11 August, followed by 25 August. Hal asked the TC if it would be interested in the presentation by Andrea Westerinen of CA Technologies on the 25th. There is general consensus that this date will work. The presentation will take a bit over one hour and will comprise the complete agenda for this TC meeting. v2 vs V3 "Diff" documentation There have been requests for an XACML v2/v3 "diff" documentation be posted to the TC site. David Brossard offered to act as editor and suggested that the TC wiki is the best location to work on the document. Hal offered to post some of his previous presentations. Rich requested that members be able to add pages to the wiki for subject matter cods. Hal explained that all TC members have the ability to add to the wiki by logging into it. Hal suggested that outcome of the diff documentation be labelled as "DRAFT/UNAPPROVED" until such time the TC feels that it is ready for formal acceptance by the TC. III. Issues Conformance test "bug" David Brossard explained why Not Applicable is the correct response in his opinion. Attribute predicate Greg Neven indicated that he will try to have an update by the next TC meeting. Obligations Jan posted to the list a question re: Obligations on Indeterminate. Erik noted that previous discussions ruled out Obligations for Indeterminate and Not Applicable because the Policies do not apply by definition. Hal requested that the TC consider this issue carefully because there are likely to be ramifications that percolate throughout the system. Design alternatives on how to solve this problem are encouraged to further the discussion.. Rich raised the question about the level of detail about conformance and attestation. Hal reviewed the Oasis guidelines for the description and acceptable conformance: /* TC Process section 2.18 (8) says: (8) Conformance Clauses. (8a) For Standards Track Work Products: A specification that is approved by the TC at the Committee Specification Public Review Draft, Committee Specification or OASIS Standard level must include a separate section, listing a set of numbered conformance clauses, to which any implementation of the specification must adhere in order to claim conformance to the specification (or any optional portion thereof). (8b) For Non-Standards Track Work Products: None required. TC Process section 1 Definitions (aq) says: "Statement of Use", with respect to a Committee Specification, is a written statement by an OASIS Organizational Member stating that it is successfully using or implementing that specification in accordance with the conformance clauses specified in Section 2.18, and stating whether its use included the interoperation of multiple independent implementations. TC Process section 3.4.1 says, in part: After the approval of a Committee Specification, and after three Statements of Use explicitly referencing the Committee Specification, including approval date, have been presented to the TC, a TC may resolve by Special Majority Vote to submit the Committee Specification as a Candidate OASIS Standard. The TC may decide to withdraw the submission, by Special Majority Vote, at any time until the final approval. Upon Resolution of the TC to submit the specification, its Chair shall submit the following items to the TC Administrator: [...] (f) The Statements of Use presented above; */ To Hal's knowledge these are the only OASIS requirements relating to Conformance. Hal also noted that XACML has had a conformance section since version 1.0, whereas it has only been required by OASIS since June 2007. meeting adjourned
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]