[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Current issues in 3.0 core
All,My apologies for missing several TC meetings due to travel which have hit those days.
In this email I have collected all issues which I believe are under discussion with regard to the current XACML 3.0 core draft. I am not aware of any issues in the "classic" profiles. Let me know if I have missed an item which should be on the list.
I have summarized the status briefly based on my understanding. But since I have missed several meetings, I might be mistaken, though I have looked through all the posted minutes.
I suggest that we go through this list on the call this week. Issue 1: Values from bag function http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201110/msg00020.html Status: no concrete proposal available.Erik's personal comment: could be done like Paul sketches, or perhaps as higher order function which takes the function to apply as an argument.
Issue 2: XACML media type http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201112/msg00015.htmlStatus: we need to do some simple changes in the spec for IANA to move forward with this.
Issue 3: New combining algorithm http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201112/msg00018.html Issue 4: Context handler http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201112/msg00039.html Status: Proposal by Ray. Issue 5: higher order function generalization http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201201/msg00018.htmlStatus: no change in functionality needed, but there seems to be consensus on renaming the functions in 3.0.
Issue 6: Section 5.29 AttributeDesignator missing xs:element line http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201201/msg00021.html Status: obvious typo Issue 7: URI equality http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml-comment/201110/msg00010.html See also many meeting minutes posted since.Status: Proposal is to not change current functionality but add some explanatory text. There is a broader discussion going on about ditching URIs altogether but I assume that is not for the 3.0 timeline.
Best regards, Erik
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]