[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] Generalizing on-permit-apply-second
Hi Steven, > -----Original Message----- > From: xacml@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xacml@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Steven Legg > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 9:11 AM > To: Erik Rissanen > Cc: Bill Parducci; xacml@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [xacml] Generalizing on-permit-apply-second > > It means a bit more policy set wrapping, but is more robust and easier to follow. I don't agree with that statement. There is a reason most programming languages have a "switch" or "case" construct in addition to "if". Thanks, Ray
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]