[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Target definition
Sounds reasonable. Keep the rules/policies as passive documents and attribute action to the PDP. Danny Thorpe
Authorization Architect
Dell
| Identity & Access Management, Quest Software Quest Software is now part of Dell. From: xacml@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xacml@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Tolbert, John W On the last call, I said that it was too soon to start working on 4.0. I am holding to that, but have a suggested change for the definition for “target” when the time is right. 3.0-- Target The set of decision requests, identified by definitions for
resource, subject and action that a
rule, policy, or policy set is intended to evaluate Proposed-- Target The set of decision requests, identified by definitions for
resource, subject and action that a
PDP is intended to evaluate according to the applicable rule,
policy, or policy set Thoughts? |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]