Re: [xcbf] X.984 note

[John Larmouth <j.larmouth@salford.ac.uk>]

I have just read this, but vaguely new it was about to happen.  I will 
be a bit opposed to this if Fast-Track is proposed, as I think that 
serious work is needed to align it properly with BioAPI.

I would also very much prefer to see this progressed in SC37 and not SC27.

These are just personal opininions and comments, not UK views.

John L


Phillip H. Griffin wrote:
> Just received the following.
> Phil
> 
> X9F4 working group and interested parties,
> We are pleased to announce that X9F4 has successfully issued the 
> revision of the American National Standard (ANS) X9.84 Biometric 
> Information Management and Security for its official 30-day X9 
> Accredited Standards Committee (ASC) and X9F Data and Information 
> Security Subcommittee ballots. 
>  
> Following the 30-day ballot and comment resolution, the standard will be 
> posted via the American National Standards Institute's (ANSI) registrar 
> for a another 30-day public comment period, after which upon final 
> approval by ANSI it will be an official American National Standard with 
> a 2003 publication date. 
>  
> Somewhere between the X9 and X9F ballots and the final publication date 
> (estimated March-April timeframe) the X9.84 standard will be submitted 
> to ISO for international standardization. 
>  
> Jeff Stapleton - X9F4 chair
> Phil Griffin - X9F4 vice chair
> 


-- 
    Prof John Larmouth
    Larmouth T&PDS Ltd
    (Training and Protocol Development Services)
    1 Blueberry Road
    Bowdon                               j.larmouth@salford.ac.uk
    Cheshire WA14 3LS                    Tel: +44 161 928 1605
    England				Fax: +44 161 928 8069