[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xdi] XDI graph as XRIs
Markus, This subject has indeed come up several
times before. I know Bill has suggested that, when looked at from an RDF graph standpoint,
every XDI document can be represented as the set of RDF statements that appear
in the document. This would include all those whose object is a literal. However when we refer to “the set of
XRIs” represented by an XDI RDF document, I have proposed that if the
object of an XDI RDF statement is a literal, the literal is NOT part of the
XRI. In other words, if you have the XDI RDF statement… =markus …the XRI that identifies the literal
object of this statement (using direct concatenation syntax) is: =markus/+email That’s as far as we’ve gone
discussing it. Is there any reason that rule will not
work? =Drummond From: Markus Sabadello
[mailto:markus.sabadello@gmail.com] Hey Bill, |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]