[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [xdi] Minutes: XDI TC Telecon Thursday 1-2PM PT2010-01-21
Hello, Thank you Drummond for these useful minutes. I have just one minor comment (below). Kind Regards, Giovanni Def. Quota "Drummond Reed" <drummond.reed@xdi.org>: > Giovanni said that he believes we need a semantic identifier for "Bill's > email" that is different than "Bill email". Since this statement may sound a bit confusing... precisely I said that: > [2:00:38 PM] GB: I'd like to have =bill+email as the concept identifying > Bill's email, whereas I'd like to have (=bill/+email) as the subject > reifying the statement =bill/$has/+email Continuing our talking on Friday, I explained that I believe that there are two concepts here: 1) (=bill/+email) is a subject representing the FACT asserting that Bill has a property, email (i.e. reification) 2) =bill+email is a subject representing the SET (or array, or collection, list, etc...) of all email instances belonging to Bill. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]