[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (XDI-11) 3.4.1 - Clarification
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XDI-11?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=40657#comment-40657 ] Joseph Boyle commented on XDI-11: ---------------------------------- I don't understand this well, so let's clarify it on the TC call. > 3.4.1 - Clarification > --------------------- > > Key: XDI-11 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XDI-11 > Project: OASIS XRI Data Interchange (XDI) TC > Issue Type: Task > Components: XDI Core > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Hubert Le Van Gong > > "The XDI address of the common root node is the empty address. Thus any XDI statement that does not begin with a peer root address or an inner root address is by definition relative to the common root node." > Q1: does this imply that such statement (per 2nd sentence) has an empty address? > Q2: as I read this, I wondered how the 2nd sentence doesn't contradict the 100% addressability goal (for the object node)? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]