[OASIS Issue Tracker] (XDI-11) 3.4.1 - Clarification

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XDI-11?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=40661#comment-40661 ] 

Hubert Le Van Gong commented on XDI-11:
---------------------------------------

I guess, by Q1 I meant to say that I don't understand how/why sentence #2 is a consequence of sentence #1 ('thus' implies causality)?

With regards to Q2: since the common root has an empty address, how is that node addressable? I think I know the answer but it would seem we need to briefly explain/clarify it.

> 3.4.1 - Clarification
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: XDI-11
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XDI-11
>             Project: OASIS XRI Data Interchange (XDI) TC
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: XDI Core
>    Affects Versions: 1.0
>            Reporter: Hubert Le Van Gong
>            Assignee: Hubert Le Van Gong
>
> "The XDI address of the common root node is the empty address. Thus any XDI statement that does not begin with a peer root address or an inner root address is by definition relative to the common root node."
> Q1: does this imply that such statement (per 2nd sentence) has an empty address?
> Q2: as I read this, I wondered how the 2nd sentence doesn't contradict the 100% addressability goal (for the object node)? 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)