Re: [xliff-comment] Purpose of name attribute for <context-group>

[Jan-Arve Sæther <jasaethe@trolltech.com>]

Ok, thanks.
The specification should probably explicitly mention that by changing 
the text to 'within the file element' or something.

Regards,
Jan- Arve

Doug Domeny wrote:

>Jan-Arve,
>
>Actually, bullet point (A) is correct.
>
>A) Each <context-group> element must have a unique name. You can't have two
>
><context-group> XML elements within the same <file> with the same 'name' 
>attribute.
>
>The specification reads, "The optional name attribute may uniquely identify
>the <context-group> within the file." When referring to 'file', the
>reference is to the <file> element.
>
>Most of the uniqueness constraints mentioned in the specification must be
>unique within the <file> element. 
>
>Regards,
> 
>Doug Domeny
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jan-Arve Sæther [mailto:jasaethe@trolltech.com] 
>Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 11:01 AM
>To: xliff-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: [xliff-comment] Purpose of name attribute for <context-group>
>
>This issue have already been raised on this list earlier 
>(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/200504/msg00000.html),
>but I did not find any answers in the archives.
>
>I am wondering on the same thing, and I am interpreting the 
>specification as what he
>mentions in bullet point B).
>
>Regards,
>
>  
>


-- 
Jan- Arve Sæther  -  jasaethe [at] trolltech [dot] com
Trolltech AS -  Sandakerveien 116 - PO Box 4332 Nydalen - 0402 Oslo, Norway