RE: [xliff] RE: [xliff-comment] Re: [xliff] FW: [xliff-comment]Purpose of name attribute for <context-group>

["Rodolfo M. Raya" <rmraya@heartsome.net>]

On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 18:03 +0100, Tony Jewtushenko wrote:

Hi,


> I think the bottom line is that either the PO/POT guide requires revision or
> we need to reconsider changing the context-group "name" attribute to be
> non-unique.  I'm leaning towards the latter.
> 
> Anyone else have ideas or input on the consequences of modifying name to be
> non-unique?


PO profile can be adapted easily without affecting anything.  And the
"name" attribute can be changed to be non-unique without breaking
anything. So, the only thing to decide is what we want to change. I
believe that neither change will affect any existing tool and the key
here is to discover why "name" was required to be unique:

Best regards,
Rodolfo
--
The information in this e-mail is intended strictly for the addressee,
without prejudices, as a confidential document. Should it reach you, not
being the addressee, it is not to be made accessible to any other
unauthorised person or copied, distributed or disclosed to any other
third party as this would constitute an unlawful act under certain
circumstances, unless prior approval is given for its transmission. The
content of this e-mail is solely that of the sender and not necessarily
that of Heartsome.