RE: [xliff-inline] 1.3. Must be able to represent paired codes that have been separated

[Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>]

Hi Bryan,

> ...I see "nid" referred to in 1.12.3.1. Is there something
> to do with the "n" in "nid" that makes it intuitive for
> its use? 

'n' was early on for 'native'. I agree: it's not a good name. Something like 'dataRef' would be clearer probably.

> If not I would prefer it to be an idref as well.

We cannot use idref twice in the same element :)

Hence the questions: Which one should be called idref? And why? (so we can justify the choice with a rationale)

-ys