[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff-inline] Type of inline codes - ballot
> The <ph> is missing from option b's wording. > I think is best to write it out in the ballot text. Good point Fredrik. How about this: ---------- How should inline codes should be represented. Essentially this is to decide if span-like code can be represented with span-like element in XLIFF 2.0. In addition this also decides if sc/ec should be a special case of ph. a) ph, pc, sc, ec: ph for placeholder codes (e.g <br>) pc for well-formed span-like codes (e.g <b>...<.b>) sc/ec for span-like codes that are not well-formed. b) ph, sc, ec: ph for placeholder codes (e.g <br>) sc/ec represent all span-like codes (well-formed and not well-formed), no pc c) ph, pc: ph for placeholder codes (e.g <br>) and for not-well-formed span-like codes (no sc/ec) pc for well-formed span-like codes (e.g <b>...<.b>) d) ph: everything is represented with ph ----------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]