[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xliff] RE: more comments on the DTD
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Yves Savourel wrote: > It is strongly recommended to use > xml:lang for <source> and <target> as well, so any XML tools (not just XLIFF > tools) can be language-aware. Why not make this required? Are there any applications that would be harmed by always having an xml:lang attribute specified on source/target elements? I argue that the converse is true and so would like to see xml:lang be a required attribute. infrastructure question: could someone please arrange for the listserv to generate a Reply-To: header containing the address of the list? This will enable us to hit "reply" instead of "reply all." Since we're all on the list, this will avoid the transmission of duplicate postings. Eric
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC