[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] RE: more comments on the DTD
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Yves Savourel wrote: > >> It is strongly recommended to use > >> xml:lang for <source> and <target> as well, so any XML tools (not just > >> XLIFF tools) can be language-aware. > > > >Why not make this required? Are there any applications that would be > >harmed by always having an xml:lang attribute specified on source/target > >elements? I argue that the converse is true and so would like to see > >xml:lang be a required attribute. > > I think we didn't make required because you could avoid to have it for one > of the two language in the document by specifying the xml:lang at the > <xliff> level and it would be redundand. Then, in the interest of simplification, let's not have it present on <source> and <target> at all and require it to be present at the <xliff> level. Eric
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC