RE: [xliff] Re: a case for "finished" as a valid value forstate

["John Reid" <JREID@novell.com>]

Title:

Hi Bryan,

 

Thanks. I agree that it is hair-splitting. I also like your definitions of the terms. I want 'final' to indicate definitive and unalterable. However, I jus remembered that we have the approved attribute in trans-unit and bin-unit that, "Indicates whether a translation is final," according to the spec. I'm not sure exactly how that affects this discussion but it seems to remove the need for 'signed-off'.

 
thanks,

john