[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] [Fwd: [xliff-comment] Schema issues with extensibleattributes]
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 10:53 +0100, Tony Jewtushenko wrote:
Hi, Looks like the current Committee Draft ballot needs to be killed … Seems so :( The TC spent several meetings in the 1.1 timeframe discussing whether to use the ##any or ##other namespaces in the extension definitions, and the decision was to use ##any specifically to enable adding XLIFF namespace attributes at the extension points. Does anyone have any thoughts on the approach we should take to deal with the validation problems? There was only one schema for XLIFF 1.1 . Now we have strict and transitional. Transitional version should use ##any for backwards compatibility, but IMO the strict schema should disallow deprecated attributes and use ##other. As for the sample files, I will correct the schemaLocation bugs and reissue hopefully the final version of the spec w/ supplementary files late today assuming we have addressed the ##any/##other issue. I assume the strict sample file should have all deprecated structures removed – could someone please confirm this approach? Looks reasonable to me. Best regards, Rodolfo
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]