|
Doug,
Very
well said. In fact, I think your two opening
sentences:
>
There are likely any number of small, insignificant differences between
>
the specification and the schema. In fact, the schema can't even validate
>
every aspect of the specification, so it will never be a pure & total
>
verification of the specification.
. . .
could apply to virtually every standard, not just XLIFF.
Bryan
Bryan, and
others,
There are likely any
number of small, insignificant differences between the specification and the
schema. In fact, the schema can't even validate every aspect of the
specification, so it will never be a pure & total verification of the
specification.
My opinion is to
proceed as planned and change the schema in future errata. If was restart the
process for every little detail, we'll never
finish.
-Doug
Domeny
From:
bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com [mailto:bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30,
2007 1:12 PM
To:
rmraya@heartsome.net; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xliff] [Fwd:
[xliff-comment] XLIFF 1.2 Errata:
Count-type]
I've
compared the Spec and the strict schema. I verify that the schema indeed
includes the state-qualifier value list for the count-type attribute, which is
not specified in the Spec. I think the best course of action is to
document this as a "fine-tuning" item to add to our future goals for errata,
and future versions of the spec. But I do not think it's critical, and I
don't think it should have any bearing on our plan to proceed toward OASIS
ballot.
If any
of the TC members have other thoughts I'd welcome them. Otherwise I'll
be happy to reply to Asgeir on the comment list, thanking him for his
continued help, and to inform him of our plans on the
issue.
-----Original
Message-----
From: Rodolfo
M. Raya [mailto:rmraya@heartsome.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:57
AM
To: XLIFF TC
Subject: [xliff] [Fwd: [xliff-comment]
XLIFF 1.2 Errata: Count-type]
Hi All,
Asgeir posted the
comment included below in the XLIFF-Comments mailing list.
Please
check the relevance of this issue.
Best regards,
Rodolfo M.
Raya
Heartsome
-------- Forwarded Message
--------
From: Asgeir Frimannsson <asgeirf@gmail.com>
To: xliff-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [xliff-comment] XLIFF 1.2 Errata:
Count-type
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:32:10
+1000 Hi all, I just noticed a small inconsistency between the schema and specification with regards to count-type attribute values: The specification defines the following union of allowed values for this attribute: 1) CountType value list 2) Xtend values 3) datatype value list 4) restype value list 5) state value list The XML schema specifies the following values: 1) CountType value list 2) Xtend values 3) datatype value list 4) restype value list 5) state value list 6) state-qualifier value list Notice that the schema allows state-qualifier values for this attribute... cheers, asgeir
|