[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] Simplified XLIFF element tree
> -----Original Message----- > From: Asgeir Frimannsson [mailto:asgeirf@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 5:45 AM > To: xliff > Subject: Re: [xliff] Simplified XLIFF element tree > > Hi Andrzej, > > From my perspective, a richer segment and structural separation can lead to > a better and richer interoperability between XLIFF and xml:tm, where the > typical XLIFF "extraction unit" is a tm:te and a segment is a tm:tu. > > I think a valid goal for all of this is > (1) to have a single representation for segmented content within XLIFF 2.0, > and > (2) to ensure that the representation of segmentation that happens post- > extraction is the same representation as one that happens in the extraction > process. Hi Asgeir, I agree with your goals. There should be one representation for segmented content, which could very well be a traditional <trans-unit> with a <source>/<target> pair. The 2nd goal can be achieved by keeping the optional unsegmented text separate from the segmented version. In other words, separate from the traditional <trans-unit> that could be used for the first goal. Regards, Rodolfo -- Rodolfo M. Raya <rmraya@maxprograms.com> Maxprograms http://www.maxprograms.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]